skeleton hell
im alex
estj
16 yrs |||| gender questioning
she/her/hers/they/them/theirs





  • chibixion:

    nyehs:

    I REFUSE

  • (Source: vinebox)

  • vinegod:

    casual by Parker Kit Hill

  • (Source: artfluids)

  • diggly:

mamacastiel:

why does this have 32k notes? it’s just a picture of a knife in a ranch bottle, is there some unspoken joke that 32 thousand people share? what is going on here, i dont get it. it’s just a fucking picture of a knife in a ranch bottle. is there some spiritual connection people have to this picture? is there some ominous and mystical reasoning that this has 32 thousand notes? do people reblog this because it makes them look like some indie blogger? or is there just something funny to this? someone please explain

no one tell him

    diggly:

    mamacastiel:

    why does this have 32k notes? it’s just a picture of a knife in a ranch bottle, is there some unspoken joke that 32 thousand people share? what is going on here, i dont get it. it’s just a fucking picture of a knife in a ranch bottle. is there some spiritual connection people have to this picture? is there some ominous and mystical reasoning that this has 32 thousand notes? do people reblog this because it makes them look like some indie blogger? or is there just something funny to this? someone please explain

    no one tell him

    (Source: zero1infinity)

  • 
finally, a soup that’s right for me

    finally, a soup that’s right for me

    (Source: wtfjapanseriously)

  • (Source: nozu)


    • Me: do you like rough sex
    • Them: yeah lip biting is great
    • Me: no you don't understand

  • um-stop:

    someone should draw me


  • radikari:

    what haircuts tell you about sexuality:

    • straight girls all have long hair
    • lesbians always have short hair
    • bisexuals wear an elegant yet easy to maintain bob
    • asexuals shave their head in the style of the pious monk
    • pansexuals put pans on their head. they put a fucking pan on th
  • (Source: juugville)

  • officialcarcinogeneticist:

cyanhyena:

vandigo:

newwavefeminism:

The automatic criminalization of black and brown bodies

Now hold on a sec I do INDEED have a problem with one picture but not the other.
In the TOP picture you can clearly see two hunting rifles and a mid-sized handgun, which are perfectly reasonable guns for a family to have, and it appears that all three people in the picture are legally old enough to at least have gone to a hunters safety course, which legally justifies the weapons being in their hands for certain purposes - hunting. Hand guns are carried by hunters to defend against bear attacks, should they happen, and by fishermen when fishing in lakes containing sturgeon … because the only way you’re killing a goddamned prehistoric dinosaur fish from hell is by shooting it (no joke).
Now the BOTTOM picture clearly contains only ONE child old enough to have gone through a hunters safety course … and not a single gun that is used for anything other than killing other human beings, and this I have a serious problem with. Guns that are intended ONLY for killing humans (the AR and AK series rifles, which are shown) with CHILDREN is a fucking problem.
Now, if they were hunting rifles in the bottom picture - you know, guns that are meant solely for the procurement of food - then I wouldn’t have an issue outside of the questionable ages of the children shown.

Really huge red flag on the bottom pic is the fact two of the kids clearly have their fingers ON THE TRIGGERS.
Its called trigger discipline. I’ve never been to any gun safety classes and I know that much.


i dont know if this counts too but the girl in the bottom right looks way too happy holding that gun

    officialcarcinogeneticist:

    cyanhyena:

    vandigo:

    newwavefeminism:

    The automatic criminalization of black and brown bodies

    Now hold on a sec I do INDEED have a problem with one picture but not the other.

    In the TOP picture you can clearly see two hunting rifles and a mid-sized handgun, which are perfectly reasonable guns for a family to have, and it appears that all three people in the picture are legally old enough to at least have gone to a hunters safety course, which legally justifies the weapons being in their hands for certain purposes - hunting. Hand guns are carried by hunters to defend against bear attacks, should they happen, and by fishermen when fishing in lakes containing sturgeon … because the only way you’re killing a goddamned prehistoric dinosaur fish from hell is by shooting it (no joke).

    Now the BOTTOM picture clearly contains only ONE child old enough to have gone through a hunters safety course … and not a single gun that is used for anything other than killing other human beings, and this I have a serious problem with. Guns that are intended ONLY for killing humans (the AR and AK series rifles, which are shown) with CHILDREN is a fucking problem.

    Now, if they were hunting rifles in the bottom picture - you know, guns that are meant solely for the procurement of food - then I wouldn’t have an issue outside of the questionable ages of the children shown.

    Really huge red flag on the bottom pic is the fact two of the kids clearly have their fingers ON THE TRIGGERS.

    Its called trigger discipline. I’ve never been to any gun safety classes and I know that much.

    i dont know if this counts too but the girl in the bottom right looks way too happy holding that gun

  • (Source: vvaddles)

  • (Source: fluffynya)

  • (Source: ctoons)

    © Melted Love